Forum:Should there be uncyclopedia in nonsence languages?
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Forums: Index > Village Dump > Should there be uncyclopedia in nonsence languages?
Note: This topic has been unedited for 4046 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over.
Like 1337 or ROT13?(and thos articles will direct to those uncyclpedias) Can of Worms 18:26, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
- More like AAAAAAAAA! Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 18:36, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
- If a 1337 Uncyclopedia were to exist, I don't think there'd be enough humor and admins to keep the wiki alive for at least a week with the crap that would pass through there. As for anything like ROT13, MD5, SHA1, Pig Latin, etc. there wouldn't be enough people I'd think that would be interested in sitting there and translating - especially codes like MD5 where a 6 letter word is elongated into a complex jumble. --~ 19:18, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
Like american ? That would be nice. --Vosnul 19:35, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
We've already got nonsense on Uncyc (with Leet, Rot13 and the like), we don't need Uncyc in nonsense. An entire Uncyclopedia in L33t would be a one note joke carried on way too far.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 21:23, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
What we need are versions of Uncyclopedia written in Redneck, Klingon, Doublespeak, Legalspeak, Elmer Fudd, Swedish Chef, and other popular languages and dialects of English. --Lt. Sir Orion Blastar (talk) 04:29, 21 November 2006 (UTC)